Friday, March 19, 2010

Gearing Up for the Gun

Today I went on my last run before the half-marathon on Sunday – just a short one as I'm officially tapering and therefore have an excuse to be lazy. I bought a new pair of shorts, and I went out at 7:30 wearing the shorts and tank top I'll wear in the race to assess whether my planned clothes were appropriate for the temperature and whether the shorts were comfortable – chafing for 13 miles is not my idea of a good time. A bit chilly, but otherwise, all systems are go.

I had to go downtown to pick up my race stuff; they wanted to check photo I.D. and so couldn't just put things in the mail. Below is all of the free* stuff I got at the expo:

Contents of checkable bag:

Newman's Own microwave popcorn

Sample of men's shower gel

Sample of skin lotion

Insulated lunch bag w/ NYRR logo on it

Guide to downtown NYC

Order form for completion plaque ($89 to $160)

Number bib (my number is lucky 8358) w/ shoe tag, detachable tickets for free t-shirt and for raffle entry, sticker for my checked bag, four safety pins

Other free* stuff:

T-shirt

Muscle Milk (samples – I sweet-talked the guy at the booth and he let me have three bottles instead of just one)

Wearable waterproof container for documents, ID, etc. w/ UV-detecting beads

The checkable bag is a clear plastic drawstring bag. I'll throw a dry t-shirt, a hoodie, some pants, and my keys in it, check it before 7:00 A.M. (the race begins at 7:30), and pick it up near the finish line after the race is over. I'm not sure about the shoe tag. It's supposed to go around my shoelaces, and often they have microchips in them so that people can track their friends'/families' progress online. I'm not sure if this one works that way; I didn't get any information about it although it does appear to have a chip on the back.

The t-shirt isn't just a standard cotton one; it's made of light, breathable mesh and has a pretty cool design on it. It's a great souvenir.


An email from the New York Road Runners has this to say about race coverage: "Beginning at 7:30 a.m. EDT, your friends and family can watch live race coverage on Universal Sports TV or stream the race on UniversalSports.com. You can set your DVR to watch it later, catch the archived on demand footage at UniversalSports.com, or check our website for familiar faces on Flotrack's feeds from the course." I do not expect anyone I know to look for me onscreen. The race is early, there will be a lot of people on the course, and I'm not even sure what Universal Sports TV is. But it's kind of cool anyway.

This website has information about TV coverage, the course, and ways to follow runners you know. I haven't looked into any of it yet, but I plan to today.

I can hardly wait for Sunday morning!

*I say "free," but what I should really say is "prepaid," since I wouldn't have gotten any of this stuff without paying the rather hefty registration fee for the race. Nonetheless, I choose to be an optimist and pretend that I got a bunch of freebies.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Wearing o' the Public Drunkenness

I agreed to work the coat check at Calico Jack's on St. Patrick's Day this year. Usually I go in at 5:15, but the manager wanted me there at noon this time. I thought it was a little on the early side, but I set out at about 11:15 anyway, figuring he knew more than I did about how this whole thing usually goes down in the city. I rode the subway with people who had clearly been celebrating already. Everyone, it seemed, was wearing green, from people in overt, kelly green t-shirts with shamrocks on them to businessmen in sage-colored dress shirts under suits. People in the Columbia area weren't really out in full St. Paddy's Day force when I got on the train, but when I emerged from Grand Central Station I saw huge groups of people, mostly college-aged kids, wandering the streets wearing green Mardi Gras beads and talking and laughing a little too loudly.

The bar was crowded but not packed when I arrived, but within an hour it was pretty full. Dave told me that last year they did $27,000 in sales on St. Patrick's Day. I'm not sure how much they made this time, but I have to guess it wasn't too far from that number. The place got most crowded around 4:00 and stayed pretty packed until about 9:00, and then the crowd started to thin out. I guess when one starts drinking before noon, one doesn't stay out as late.

The bouncers at Calico Jack's are pretty good about getting rid of people who look like they're too drunk to be there, whether they're getting rowdy or just look like they might start throwing up any second. I saw some people who weren't doing so hot, but nothing terribly noteworthy. Employees who came in from the outside, however, said that it was chaos - people sleeping against planter boxes, throwing up in the gutters, etc. Yikes. I saw some questionable dancing from where I was sitting, and at one point a confused girl stood next to me for about five minutes, swaying now and then and looking blearily around until her friends swooped down on her - they thought she'd wandered off - but that was just about it. The general level of drunkenness was pretty remarkable, though. Dave, who has worked at this bar for over a year, said that he'd never seen so many people in such bad shape before, and despite the fraternity parties I sometimes attended at Vanderbilt, have to agree. It was certainly interesting to watch, however.

At about 10:00, a group from the NYC police department filed in wearing kilts, climbed onto the bar, and played bagpipes for about five minutes. I'm not sure what the connection to St. Patrick's Day was exactly, bagpipes being from, y'know, Scotland, but they put on a good show and the crowd seemed to be pretty into it.

I met several actual Irishmen as well. Several of them kept popping by the closet to say hello, although I got a bit tired of them after a while, despite their accents. I guess they had a better excuse to overindulge than anyone else there did, though.

Usually the bar closes at 4:00 A.M., but we shut down, to my profound relief, around 2:00. I didn't make much money - the weather was gorgeous and warm and not conducive to coat-wearing - and so one of the managers just let me keep everything in the cash box, which I was grateful for. At closing, I had three coats left in the closet, which is unusual. A girl came staggering in after we'd supposedly locked the doors and thrust her ticket at me to claim one of them. I recognized her as one of a trio who had checked coats, and I asked her where her two friends were. One of them had left a purse with her iPhone and other important-looking things (I didn't want to dig around too much; I just peeked inside.) She mumbled, "I d'no," and staggered back out again. Hmmm.

As I headed home, the streets and, later, the subway station were dotted with work crews cleaning up. I'm used to seeing a garbage truck here and there that early in the morning, but this time I saw huge trucks with high-powered hoses attached to water tanks and people equipped with brooms and mops. The sidewalks and platforms were being absolutely scoured. I can't imagine how things must have looked before the clean-up started, but this afternoon when I took the subway into midtown again, everything was clean. As clean as it ever gets in New York anyway.

It wasn't the most exciting night I've ever had, but I was glad to make some money and do some first class people-watching. I had fun hanging out with Dave and the other employees, most of whom I really like. And I got a great lesson in the fine art of self control.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Wet, witchy weekend in Boston

I went to Boston on Saturday to spend two nights with Anthony and Jane. I didn't arrive until around 8:30, and Anthony and Jane had dinner well underway by the time I walked through the door. It had been rainy and windy in New York and due to some complications with my bus ticket (which I won't go into here but am happy to describe at length if you care to call) I stood waiting in the rain on the sidewalk for far longer than I'd anticipated. I managed to dry off completely on the bus, but the few blocks I walked from the station the Anthony and Jane's apartment negated all of that. (Umbrellas work only when the water is coming from above, not from the sides.) Oh well, we had salmon and polenta and brussel sprouts, all washed down with wine, so I was content. After dinner, we braved the rain again to go to a movie theater on the other side of Boston Commons. We met some of Anthony and Jane's friends and watched "Shutter Island," which was disappointing at first but moderately intriguing by the end. Not sure that I'd recommend it. I certainly wouldn't if you're home alone on a dark and stormy night.

We went home and awoke to more rain the next day. After a delicious, late brunch at a nearby restaurant, we sipped coffee and tried to figure out what to do with the rest of the day. We hated to sit around, but it was pretty awful out, so a museum seemed to be the thing to do. But Anthony and Jane had been to the Museum of Fine Arts recently, and we were all sort of at a loss until Jane suggested the Salem Witch Museum. Anthony and I were game, and I added that, to keep the theme going, we could rent "The Crucible" to watch after dinner. So we got directions, piled into Anthony's car, and drove half an hour to Salem.

Jane slept through the drive, and Anthony and I chatted. Visibility was awful, and the lane nearest the median had unexpected, deep puddles periodically which yanked the car to the left each time we hit one. The directions were tricky, and it was a relief to pull up to the somewhat creepy-looking church-like building in which the museum is housed.

This picture is from the Internet, not my camera. Our weather was not nearly so nice.

We paid $7 each and looked at a few placards in the lobby for a few minutes until a young, heavy-set blonde peered through dark swipes of eyeliner and announced that because there weren't many artifacts from this time period, the "museum" consisted of a presentation and then a guided tour. She cautioned us that the room we were about to enter would be dark and that there were steps, then led us down some steps into a dark room. On raised platforms around the perimeter were darkened dioramas. I could make out what looked like a courtroom on one side. The presentation began, and we endured 20 minutes of cheesy narration. Different dioramas lit up periodically to illustrate the story and occasionally townspeople's words would be delivered by the voices of decidedly talentless actors. In a corner, a large figure of the Devil lit up when he was mentioned (which was often), his eyes glowing red.

At the conclusion of the performance, we walked with the two other groups that had endured the presentation into an exhibit called Changing Perceptions, or something like that. It documented public opinion of witchcraft through the years, and there were yet more unconvincing, full-sized models of people who spoke when our guide pushed a button on the wall. She briefly waved her hand at display cases filled with placards, then ushered us past them so that we had virtually no time to read the information. Jane pointed out that it was the last tour of the day and that they were probably anxious to get us out.

We picked up frozen pizza dough and other supplies on the way home, rented the movie, and spent the evening eating mostly homemade pizza and watching "The Crucible," which I think is fantastic. Jane said that it all seemed so implausible that she would have disregarded the movie as being poorly done if she didn't know that it had all actually happened.

Monday morning, I left a few minutes after Anthony and Jane took off for work, maneuvered my way through another bus ticket fiasco, and got back to New York safe and sound. It's gray, but the rain has mostly stopped, and I've got a final 13-mile run scheduled for tomorrow. It'll be my last long one before Sunday's race. All in all, a good weekend, and now it's back to my masters project.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Masters project

Today I had the last class I'll have to sit through for ten glorious days. Spring break begins tomorrow, but I couldn't get my act together in time to figure out where to go, and as a result am staying in NYC (except for a two-night trip to Boston to visit AnthonyCourtneyJane). This is fine with me for several reasons. For one, aside from a bus ticket, my day-to-day expenses won't rise, which is a good thing; warm weather is great for a lot of reasons, but for career coat checkers it's decidedly inconvenient. Secondly, the half-marathon is the final Sunday of the break, meaning that if I'd gone anywhere, I'd have to have come back a few days early anyway to rest up. Also, being in New York with lots of unstructured time is hardly a hardship - I look forward to checking out heretofore unexplored museums/parts of town. (I plan to get my very own New York City public library card!!!) Finally, most practically (and least thrillingly), I've been putting off doing any serious work on my masters project.

To graduate from the reading specialist program, each one of us has to submit a masters project during the final spring of our coursework. Because I intend to finish in December of this year, my project is due this semester. In fact, it's due twelve days from now.

We were given a great deal of latitude as far as the specifics of our project. Everyone has to fill a certain number of pages (although a weary-looking Dr. Masullo told us she refused to read any more than 20) and cite a certain number of sources. Beyond that, we were given a list of suggestions and the instructions to clear any original ideas with Dr. Masullo before getting started. Projects are either accepted or not accepted - there are no grades given. This sounds scary, but we'll be given the opportunity to revise our projects if, heaven forbid, they're not up to snuff for graduation standards.

Dr. Masullo suggested early last semester, before we even really knew what she was talking about, that Jill and I collaborate on a masters project centered in some way around Heritage High School. This makes sense for a lot of reasons. Jill and I have both been dragging ourselves to Heritage twice a week, a bonding experience if there ever was one (although we usually don't go on the same days). We are required to submit some sort of report for the Zankel Fellowship near the end of the year, and while it doesn't need to anything formal, focusing our masters project on Heritage will preclude our having to do any additional work. I am almost always in favor of a course of action that involves this perk. In addition, if anyone pays attention to it our project could improve instruction at Heritage after we've submitted it to the principal. Even if no one at Heritage gives it a second glance, however, it's the sort of work that's going to look pretty good on a resume, and Dr. Masullo can hardly fail to mention such a practical, masterful application of our newly-acquired knowledge in any letters of recommendation she writes on our behalf. So all in all, it seemed like a pretty good idea.

The only problem with the proposal is that Courtney, my sidekick (if only in spirit sometimes when we're on different continents) and soulmate is the only person I've ever really worked well with. I can tolerate group work to an extent, but for major collaborative planning, it's Courtney or nothing. I like to do things my way. And Jill has proved to be...a challenge to work with. I came up with the idea for our project, reading comprehension, and then, after she failed to contribute any inspiration of her own, narrowed it down to the idea of focusing half the paper on comprehension in English/reading classrooms and half on comprehension across content areas like history and science. Later, I submitted our proposed outline to Dr. Masullo while Jill was in Boston with her boyfriend for the weekend. We split up the research end of it so that I was looking for English/reading articles and Jill took the content area portion, but after I'd found a promising stack of resourcnes, Jill said she was having trouble and so we switched and I took her section over and gave her what I'd found. At our last meeting, Jill (who is leaving for the Bahamas with her boyfriend tomorrow) threw up her hands and said that she had no idea what she was doing and that she would give me her written section and that I should transform it to my heart's content. Gracious.

Let me make it clear that I like Jill very much. She is not shirking her part of the paper or dropping the ball intentionally, she really just has no clue what she's doing. In many ways, I sort of feel sorry for her. I know it makes her feel guilty and uncomfortable that she's not pulling her weight. I also feel a little sorry for myself; this whole process would honestly be easier if I just did the whole thing, and I'm not really comfortable telling her what to do or criticizing her contributions. But it is what it is, and I'm going to just make the best of it and look forward to March 23rd, the day after we'll have submitted the damn thing.

As far as my end of it goes, I'm sort of embarrassed to admit that I'm really enjoying the process. I'm taking a study break at the moment. It's 2:00 in the morning and I'm alone in a study lounge (who studies during the first night of spring break?) very literally surrounded by articles and pages and pages of notes. I'm not tired in the least and although I keep telling myself to head upstairs and watch the Netflix DVD that arrived today, I can't really bring myself to stop reading, highlighting, organizing, synthesizing... So while staying home and working on a research paper for spring break isn't necessarily my idea of a good time, I have to say I'm not at all disappointed about the way things have fallen into place.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Definition: tedium

When I was teaching at St. Paul's, I was required to submit a lesson plan for each of my classes at the beginning of the week. My plans would be posted online to guide students and parents through the days until Friday. Usually, each day would say something like "Read Chapter 18 - discuss," or "Begin Vocab. Unit #8; edit setting paragraph." Period, amen. I suspect that I would have had to go into much more detail about my plans had the effectiveness of my plans been in question. As things stood, the administration and parents trusted me enough that this skeletal outline was all the documentation required.

Behold how times change: Below, I've pasted in one of the LISPs (Literary Intervention Session Plan) that I have to write twice a week to guide my sessions with my six-year-old client. After implementing all of the things detailed in the LISP, I have to write an SAS (Session Assessment Summary), which contains information about the client's performance in each of the areas I targeted. A typical SAS is 1.5 to 2 times the length of a LISP. I'm not certain whether I'll have to go into this much detail in my professional life when I plan, should I decided to become a literacy coach, reading specialist, or go into private practice; if so, it's enough to make me lean towards housewifery.


Literacy Intervention Session Plan #7

Goals for the Semester and Objectives for Session:

1. To improve alphabetic knowledge

a. The client will say the alphabet in sequence. {1a}

b. The client will put lowercase letters in alphabetical order. {1b}

c. The client will write the lowercase letters in alphabetical order. {1c}

2. To improve sight word knowledge

a. The client will identify differences between that and this. {2a}

b. The client will recognize that and this with automaticity. {2b}

c. The client will spell that and this correctly. {2c}

3. To develop decoding skills

a. The client will blend different onsets with the rimes –et, -en, and -eg. {3a}

b. The client will identify words from the –at, -ot, and -it families. {3b}

4. To develop encoding skills

a. The client will separate the onset from words in the –et, -en, and -eg families. {4a}

b. The client will spell words from the –et, -en, and -eg families. {4b}

5. To improve reading comprehension

a. The client will identify a problem faced by characters in The Cat in the Hat. {5a}

6. To strengthen written expression

a. The client will answer a yes/no opinion question.{6a}

b. The client will list text-based reasons for his answer to an opinion question on a graphic organizer. {6b}

Materials:

Paper and pencil, chart with upper- and lowercase letters of alphabet written on it (practitioner created), cards with lowercase letters written on them from previous session, sight word ring, cards from the Words Their Way Word Study Notebook (–et, -en, and -eg families), Word Family log sheet (practitioner created), laptop with Internet access, story map graphic organizer from Scholastic.com, "The Ugly Duckling" (practitioner adapted), The Cat in the Hat by Dr. Seuss (with one photocopied page), colored pencils, opinion question graphic organizer (practitioner created)

Procedures:

I. Familiar Text Time

The client will either read or tell the practitioner about The Christmas Bear.


II. Skill and Strategy Instruction

A. Alphabetic Knowledge

1. The client will recite the alphabet, using his finger to follow the alphabet chart. {1a}

2. The client will put cards with lowercase letters on them in alphabetical order, making reference to the chart if necessary. {1b}

3. The client will recite the alphabet again, using his finger to follow the cards as he checks his work. {1a}

4. The client will write the uppercase letters of the alphabet in order. {1c}

B. Sight Word Knowledge

1. The practitioner will show the client that and this on cards. They will discuss the differences/similarities between the two words. {2a}

2. The client will practice reading the words several times. {2b}

3. The practitioner will write that on a piece of paper.

4. The client will look at that and read it out loud.

5. The client will trace the letters with his finger while saying the letters aloud.

6. The client will close his eyes and visualize the word, spelling it aloud.

7. The client will sky write the word, saying the letters aloud.

8. The client will write the word three times on paper.

9. The client will write the word from memory. {2c}

10. The client will repeat these steps with this. {2a}, {2b}, {2c}

11. The practitioner will give the following dictations, using words from his word ring and today's new words: Who wants this? Can I get help with that? {1a}

12. If the client spells the new words correctly, he will add them to his ring. Any words he misspells will be taken off the ring and added to a list for further practice.


C. Decoding and Encoding

1. The client will sort picture cards from the Words Their Way Word Study Notebook from the -et, -en, and -eg families. He will check his work by saying the names of the pictures in each column.

2. The client will match another set of word cards to each picture, labeling it. Then the client will read the word cards in each column. {3a}

3. The client will copy the words from one of the families into the first column of a Word Family log sheet.

4. The client will write the words again, separating the onsets from the rimes. {4a}

5. The client will move his finger from the Onset column to the Rime column as he blends the two into a word. {3b}

6. The client will play "Missing Letter" on the SpellingCity.com website, using the eleven words from the cards. {4b}

D. Reading Comprehension

Review: The client will state the title, author, characters, and setting of The Cat in the Hat.

1. The practitioner will explain the term "problem" as it relates to story grammar.

2. The practitioner will read "The Ugly Duckling." The client will help to fill in the parts of the story map he has learned in previous sessions. The practitioner will model the process of identifying the problem in the story.

E. Written Expression

1. The practitioner will model filling out a graphic organizer in preparation for writing a response to the following opinion question: Would you like to ride a fast roller coaster? The practitioner will elicit the client's help in writing one or two reasons why it would be a good or bad idea (or a combination of both) in two columns, one labeled with a smiling face and one with a frowning face.

2. The practitioner will allow the client to choose from the following prompts: Would you like it to be Christmas every day? Would you like to have a pet elephant? Would you be happy if school was cancelled forever? Would you like it to be summer all year? The client will answer the question and then use a graphic organizer to plan an answer to the question using reasons to justify his answer. {6a}, {6b}

III. Guided Reading

Review: The practitioner will ask the client to define "problem," and explain the problem in "The Ugly Duckling."

1. The practitioner will ask the client to think about The Cat in the Hat and name the main problem. {5a}

2. The client will continue to read The Cat in the Hat and will add the second main problem in the story. {5a}

IV. Written Expression

Review: The practitioner will remind the client of the graphic organizers used earlier in the lesson. 1. The practitioner will present the client with the question Would you like the Cat in the Hat to visit your house?

2. The client will answer the question, then use events from The Cat in the Hat to explain his answer. The practitioner will encourage the client to refer back to the book to remind him of the events as he identifies his reasons. {6a}, {6b}

V. Personalized Reading

The client will read through The Christmas Bear or the story he dictated during the last session, or, if he chooses, select a new book from the Home Book Depot.

Criteria for Evaluation:

1. The client will say the alphabet in sequence. {1a}

2. The client will put lowercase letters in alphabetical order. {1b}

3. The client will write the lowercase letters in alphabetical order. {1c}

4. The client will identify differences between that and this. {2a}

5. The client will recognize that and this with automaticity. {2b}

6. The client will spell that and this correctly. {2c}

7. The client will blend different onsets with the rimes –et, -en, and -eg. {3a}

8. The client will identify words from the –at, -ot, and -it families. {3b}

9. The client will separate the onset from words in the –et, -en, and -eg families. {4a}

10. The client will spell words from the –et, -en, and -eg families. {4b}

11. The client will identify a problem faced by characters in The Cat in the Hat. {5a}

12. The client will answer a yes/no opinion question. {6a}

13. The client will list text-based reasons for his answer to an opinion question. {6b}

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Spring is springing up everywhere!

Spotted yesterday while running through Central Park (with no gloves, ear-warmer, jacket, or insulated tights): buds on several trees, shrinking snowdrifts, and these:

Not sure what they're called, but I was happy to see them, along with other greenery starting to peek through the chilly mud along the sides of the road. Honestly, winter in New York wasn't that bad, although I'm pleased that spring is on the way!

Monday, March 1, 2010

Ice-T in the morning is better than coffee

This morning, while walking to Heritage for another action-packed day, I noticed a crowd of people gathered around jumble of various indiscriminate objects on the sidewalk across the street from Central Park. At first, I thought it was some kind of rummage sale. As I got closer, I realized that a filming of the TV series "Law and Order: SVU" was being filmed! Below is an Internet photograph of two of the characters, Detective Tutuola (played by Ice-T, former gangsta rapper-turned TV cop, a natural progression) and Detective Munch (played by Richard Belzer).


Now, check out the picture I managed to snap from my BlackBerry. (You see why I included the close-up photo for reference? This shot was the best I could do.) The white-haired man directly left of the guy in the turquoise parka is Belzer, and the guy to his left is Ice-T. I heard Belzer say something about a revolving door - not sure if that was dialogue or just commentary on his part - but that was about all I could get over the street noise.


Would I have recognized these guys from across a street too early on an absurdly sunny morning? Heck no. But the folding chairs below clued me in. You can't tell in this photo, but they say "Law and Order" on the back of them.


Gotta love this city.